At last, a Fulhamish contributor talking sense on this issue (my comment on yesterday’s Fulhamish article made this very point). Too many of your contributors seem to think it is heresy to question Marco but even the pope isn’t infallible.
He is right, it's way too defensive minded. I understand the reason Silva is doing this. It's too try and get sessengonon up the pitch but too go against that argument I have it's not working at all and very left sided so teams know how too defend so easily against us.
Relax. Good lord. “Just isn’t working” seems a bit harsh. The Villa game got away from us. The potential handball was most likely going in and King also could have easily gotten a goal or penalty. If we get something in that game you all aren’t saying sh$&. It’s fine. We are a very good side. When games get away from us they get away big time. That’s more of the problem. You all are so dramatic. Haha. Oh, and stop saying “fill the shoes of Palhinha.” You just sound like a redundant douche. Those two are doing much more.
I've been saying this for ages, one or other but not both. They've had a huge job filling Palhinha boots who popped up with a goal or two. Lukic had some great chances in the 2nd half against Fulham, I'm sure Smith-Rowe would have put at least one of them away.
Putting aside our rosaries for a second the article is spot on even for Atheists.
Lukic was an excellent stand in for Palhinha not a replacement…Berge and Lukic doesn’t work offensively…truth is the two of them combined to not add up to JP.
Iwobi , Lukic and King makes far more sense although signing Hackney last window was what should have happened…Lukic and Berge on the bench.
As for ESR falling back please get real.
He pulls out of tackles again and again.
He was so bad last week, worse even than usual.
Palhinha has not been replaced…let’s sign Hackney in January please.
At last, a Fulhamish contributor talking sense on this issue (my comment on yesterday’s Fulhamish article made this very point). Too many of your contributors seem to think it is heresy to question Marco but even the pope isn’t infallible.
Well, what is the Pope's view then?
Well, what's the Pope's view, then?
He is right, it's way too defensive minded. I understand the reason Silva is doing this. It's too try and get sessengonon up the pitch but too go against that argument I have it's not working at all and very left sided so teams know how too defend so easily against us.
Relax. Good lord. “Just isn’t working” seems a bit harsh. The Villa game got away from us. The potential handball was most likely going in and King also could have easily gotten a goal or penalty. If we get something in that game you all aren’t saying sh$&. It’s fine. We are a very good side. When games get away from us they get away big time. That’s more of the problem. You all are so dramatic. Haha. Oh, and stop saying “fill the shoes of Palhinha.” You just sound like a redundant douche. Those two are doing much more.
I've been saying this for ages, one or other but not both. They've had a huge job filling Palhinha boots who popped up with a goal or two. Lukic had some great chances in the 2nd half against Fulham, I'm sure Smith-Rowe would have put at least one of them away.
Against Villa, why can't I turn predictive text off? Or do I have to read everything back before posting?
Putting aside our rosaries for a second the article is spot on even for Atheists.
Lukic was an excellent stand in for Palhinha not a replacement…Berge and Lukic doesn’t work offensively…truth is the two of them combined to not add up to JP.
Iwobi , Lukic and King makes far more sense although signing Hackney last window was what should have happened…Lukic and Berge on the bench.
As for ESR falling back please get real.
He pulls out of tackles again and again.
He was so bad last week, worse even than usual.
Palhinha has not been replaced…let’s sign Hackney in January please.
He’s apparently a Roma supporter, so who knows.