Discussion about this post

User's avatar
lovetempo's avatar

I don’t think we can be relying on Berge to be a midfield enforcer. If you look at how he played with Norway, that wasn’t his role. He’s not fast enough or defensively inclined enough to be the one who stops the other team from breaking away. I see how he is a skilled player and a great safety valve for holding the ball and playing out of the back, but I don’t think he is the right player for our team. He either needs replacing or the system needs tweaking to allow for him to play in a role that better suits him.

TL's avatar
Aug 25Edited

Fact 1 - the scoreline flattered us, we should be viewing that as a 4-1 loss.

Fact 2 - if we continue to play that way, we WILL get relegated, it's unsustainable.

Fact 3 - Every other team will also 'get better as the season goes on', so we can't keep trotting that line out.

The game went pretty much as I predicted (on this site and others): Bobb and Kevin being slightly better Traores; Palacios not being able to cut it in a actual PL intensity match; Garcia huffing amd puffing to not much real affect, regardless of goal. As good as King was, he still made several poor decisions in key moments. I think the main problem was playing slow, immobile Berge and Iwobi along with lightweight Palacios. Might get away with that against Ipswich or Hull, but it was a massivley naive risk against a team like Chelsea. They were all badly exposed and couldn't cover for each other, so it resulted in an exponentially greater weakness in the foundation of the team. I would start Sess in place of Palacios and Charles in place of Iwobi. That should give Berge and the CBs a bit more effective cover without losing much in attack. And the defence needs to get a bit closer, of course.

11 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?