Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Steve Dutch's avatar

Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder, I guess! I never did warm to him and remember only a handful of games during which he performed in accordance with his own, obvious, opinion of himself. You could never fault his work-rate, but the measure for an attacking midfield player is, how does that work-rate translate into goal involvements: for me, he'll always be a player who flattered to deceive; someone often on the cusp of being as impactful as he thought he was, but, apart from a handful of games, not. he also suffers, both by comparison to Carvalho, before him, and to King, after him. Obviously, re: the latter it's only very early days, so that is probably unfair, but if what we saw against Chelsea is a glimpse of what might be to come, then Fulham were correct in letting him go for some cash, rather than seeing out his contract.

Expand full comment
John Brooker's avatar

A balanced and good account of his time at Fulham. If he had been relieved of his free kick and corner duties earlier, I think fans would have been a lot more supportive, me included, especially seeing what Jimenez can do with a free kick.

Expand full comment

No posts