This write up seems a bit harsh. For me Fulham controlled the game and were aggressive in their attack for the most part, seemingly deserving all 3 points. A bit unlucky not to have the lead well before the Guehi goal with the chances created. If we’re protecting a late lead, maybe it’s Diop in a back 5 marking Guehi not Josh King.
Maybe a little critical of Fulham, but I don't think we were quite as controlling as we needed to be (certainly didn't translate into enough goals to warrant three points!) and Palace were happy to let us play in front of them, take the ball off us and get the ball quickly to their own outlets, something that produced both Palace goals (and a good few other close moments too). If we'd kept ESR and Chuk on then maybe we'd have sustained the aggression we had before and just after the interval?
Perhaps it's just the rumbling worries of being a little too close to the bottom three as well, but we really could have done with a point here.
This write up seems a bit harsh. For me Fulham controlled the game and were aggressive in their attack for the most part, seemingly deserving all 3 points. A bit unlucky not to have the lead well before the Guehi goal with the chances created. If we’re protecting a late lead, maybe it’s Diop in a back 5 marking Guehi not Josh King.
Maybe a little critical of Fulham, but I don't think we were quite as controlling as we needed to be (certainly didn't translate into enough goals to warrant three points!) and Palace were happy to let us play in front of them, take the ball off us and get the ball quickly to their own outlets, something that produced both Palace goals (and a good few other close moments too). If we'd kept ESR and Chuk on then maybe we'd have sustained the aggression we had before and just after the interval?
Perhaps it's just the rumbling worries of being a little too close to the bottom three as well, but we really could have done with a point here.