Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Richard Hirst's avatar

Marco arguably the club’s strongest asset? An otherwise honest assessment of Fulham’s failings is let down by that comment. Some of us have argued for the last season and a half that Marco is holding the club back, not taking it forward, and today was the most extreme example of that.

Palace in the cup last season was bad enough but this was far worse. Safe in the league we had every opportunity to go full out for cup success, yet what does Marco do? Picks a second choice midfield, second choice full backs and a second rate, not fully fit striker. He then compounds his errors by his normal stubborness in refusing to acknowledge his mistakes. He should have made substitutions at halftime, or at the very least after an hour, but no. And to bring on Jimenez in the third minute of stoppage time was an insult to the player and to the fans.

The club should pay off the remainder of Marco’s contract and bring in a new manager now, with time to look at the squad before the summer transfer window. Otherwise we face stagnation and decline.

CinCity Noir's avatar

Two stinkers in a row - I don't know how you can muster the words to describe the badness. But, you know how to cut through the mud, to be polite, to produce a quality game report.

It's beyond disappointing to see a team with so much quality and potential fall so flat. All credit to Southampton who came ready to play. The game was played at 7:00 a.m. in the States and, for Fulham, it too often looked like it was 7 a.m. in SW6.

On TV here at the half, the commentator (I think it was Shaka Hislop) remarked that it doesn't appear the Fulham coach knows his best team. Today was another knock against Silva and the team's readiness for matches.

8 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?